Convert anything, at global scale.
200+ formats and automation APIs that feels instant.
CONVERT
From
To
Drop files or choose a source
Upload multiple files at once, mix formats, and fine-tune every conversion with format-aware settings.
Max 2GB per file · Drag & drop ready · Mixed file types welcome
ARI at a glance
ARI
Digital photography fragmented into many manufacturer-specific raw formats because camera makers optimized for their own sensors, metadata, and software ecosystems rather than for one shared public raw standard.
PGX at a glance
PGX
These formats persist in engineering, compression research, and conversion-tool contexts where simple sample storage or adjunct technical representation is useful.
Format comparison
| Feature | ARI | PGX |
|---|---|---|
| File type | Image | Image |
| Extensions |
|
|
| MIME type |
|
|
| Compression / quality | raw | depends |
| File size characteristics | large | medium |
| Compatibility | limited | broad |
| Editability | high | moderate |
| Created year | 2010 | 2000 |
| Inventor | ARRI (Arnold & Richter) | ISO/IEC (JPEG 2000 committee) |
| Status | proprietary | active |
| Transparency | Not supported | Not supported |
| Animation | Not supported | Not supported |
| Primary use cases |
|
|
| Common software |
|
|
| Archival suitability | strong | moderate |
| Metadata handling | rich | moderate |
| Delivery profile | limited | strong |
| Workflow fit | source | delivery |
| Layer support | Not supported | Not supported |
| Vector scaling | Not supported | Not supported |
| Camera raw data | Supported | Not supported |
| HDR support | Not supported | Not supported |
| Streaming ready | Not supported | Not supported |
When to use each format
When to use ARI
- capture ingest
- editing
- web or print delivery
- Preserve capture-stage image data for later interpretation.
When to use PGX
- capture ingest
- editing
- web or print delivery
- Useful for technical sample interchange and tooling.
FAQs
Why convert ARI to PGX?
Choose PGX as target when a technical imaging or codec workflow expects grayscale component data in a simple specialist format.
What changes when converting ARI to PGX?
Convert to PGX when a technical imaging or codec workflow expects grayscale component data in a simple specialist format. It is useful for research, testing, and standards-oriented image processing.
What should I review after converting ARI to PGX?
After conversion, review these destination checks: Open converted output in codec tooling and verify behavior on real samples; Compare output against the expected depends quality profile; Not intended for mainstream publishing or editing.
How can I keep quality stable in ARI to PGX conversion?
Run representative samples, keep settings deterministic, and monitor these risks: Sparse everyday application support; Not intended for mainstream publishing or editing; Validate destination compatibility before large-batch conversion.