Convert anything, at global scale.
200+ formats and automation APIs that feels instant.
CONVERT
From
To
Drop files or choose a source
Upload multiple files at once, mix formats, and fine-tune every conversion with format-aware settings.
Max 2GB per file · Drag & drop ready · Mixed file types welcome
NanoMD at a glance
NanoMD
NanoMD represents the recurring tendency in documentation tooling to carve out restricted markdown subsets whenever implementers value deterministic parsing, low overhead, and minimal feature surfaces over full compatibility.
KRA at a glance
KRA
Krita's native format reflects the rise of open-source digital painting as a serious creative workflow rather than only a hobbyist alternative.
Format comparison
| Feature | NanoMD | KRA |
|---|---|---|
| File type | Not available | Not available |
| Extensions |
|
|
| MIME type |
|
|
| Compression / quality | Not available | Not available |
| File size characteristics | Not available | Not available |
| Compatibility | Not available | Not available |
| Editability | Not available | Not available |
| Created year | Not available | Not available |
| Inventor | Not available | Not available |
| Status | Not available | Not available |
| Primary use cases |
|
|
| Common software |
|
|
| Archival suitability | Not available | Not available |
| Metadata handling | Not available | Not available |
| Delivery profile | Not available | Not available |
| Workflow fit | Not available | Not available |
| Vector scaling | Not available | Not available |
When to use each format
When to use NanoMD
- authoring
- review and collaboration
- distribution
- Keeps parsing and rendering requirements intentionally small.
When to use KRA
- capture ingest
- editing
- web or print delivery
- Preserves editor-specific layered working state.
FAQs
Why convert NanoMD to KRA?
Choose KRA as target when the artwork needs to remain editable in Krita, especially for painting-heavy or layered illustration workflows.
What changes when converting NanoMD to KRA?
Convert to KRA when the artwork needs to remain editable in Krita, especially for painting-heavy or layered illustration workflows. It is the right target for preserving native editability during digital-art production.
What should I review after converting NanoMD to KRA?
After conversion, review these destination checks: Open converted output in Krita and verify behavior on real samples; Compare output against the expected depends quality profile; Not a cross-tool final-delivery format.
How can I keep quality stable in NanoMD to KRA conversion?
Run representative samples, keep settings deterministic, and monitor these risks: Conversion to flatter outputs can discard the editable state users actually care about; Not a cross-tool final-delivery format; Validate destination compatibility before large-batch conversion.