Convert anything, at global scale.
200+ formats and automation APIs that feels instant.
CONVERT
From
To
Drop files or choose a source
Upload multiple files at once, mix formats, and fine-tune every conversion with format-aware settings.
Max 2GB per file · Drag & drop ready · Mixed file types welcome
ORF at a glance
ORF
ORF belongs to the long Olympus digital-camera story, especially in the Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds eras where portability and serious editing often coexisted.
JPS at a glance
JPS
JPS belongs to the period when consumer 3D displays, cameras, and media players experimented with stereo-photo conventions built on ordinary JPEG assets instead of inventing entirely new everyday imaging stacks.
Format comparison
| Feature | ORF | JPS |
|---|---|---|
| File type | Image | Image |
| Extensions |
|
|
| MIME type |
|
|
| Created year | 2003 | 2000 |
| Inventor | Olympus (now OM System) | JPEG Stereoscopic community |
| Status | proprietary | active |
| Transparency | Not supported | Not supported |
| Animation | Not supported | Not supported |
| Primary use cases |
|
|
| Layer support | Not supported | Supported |
| Vector scaling | Not supported | Supported |
| Camera raw data | Supported | Not supported |
| HDR support | Not supported | Not supported |
| Streaming ready | Not supported | Supported |
When to use each format
When to use ORF
- Your source file is already in ORF.
- Preserve source expectations before exporting to JPS.
- ORF is commonly used in image workflows.
When to use JPS
- Your target workflow expects JPS.
- Improve delivery compatibility with JPS.
- JPS is commonly used in image workflows.
FAQs
Why convert ORF to JPS?
Convert to JPS when preserving stereoscopic photo pairs, preparing side-by-side 3D images for compatible viewers, or maintaining archives from cameras and displays that used the JPEG Stereo convention.
It is mainly useful for legacy stereoscopic-image exchange rather than mainstream still-image publishing.
What changes when converting ORF to JPS?
This conversion changes how the format behaves in downstream tools and delivery environments.
Moving to JPS adds layer support. Moving to JPS adds vector scaling. Moving to JPS removes camera raw data. Moving to JPS adds streaming delivery.
What should I review after converting ORF to JPS?
Validate output quality on representative files and confirm the target format behaves correctly in the destination workflow.