Convert anything, at global scale.
200+ formats and automation APIs that feels instant.
CONVERT
From
To
Drop files or choose a source
Upload multiple files at once, mix formats, and fine-tune every conversion with format-aware settings.
Max 2GB per file · Drag & drop ready · Mixed file types welcome
PFA at a glance
PFA
Type 1 fonts were central to the rise of desktop publishing, and PFA/PFB formats reflect the era when font technology was tightly linked to PostScript workflows.
TTF at a glance
TTF
TrueType emerged from Apple and Microsoft efforts around scalable digital typography, and it later became part of the broader OpenType ecosystem.
Format comparison
| Feature | PFA | TTF |
|---|---|---|
| File type | Font | Font |
| Extensions |
|
|
| MIME type |
|
|
| Compression / quality | scalable | scalable |
| File size characteristics | small | small |
| Compatibility | broad | broad |
| Editability | limited | limited |
| Created year | 1984 | 1991 |
| Inventor | Adobe | Apple and Microsoft lineage |
| Status | active | active |
| Transparency | Not supported | Not supported |
| Primary use cases |
|
|
| Common software |
|
|
| Archival suitability | strong | strong |
| Metadata handling | low | low |
| Delivery profile | strong | strong |
| Workflow fit | design | design |
| Layer support | Not supported | Not supported |
| Vector scaling | Not supported | Supported |
When to use each format
When to use PFA
- type design
- brand system deployment
- web embedding
- Historically significant in typography.
When to use TTF
- type design
- brand system deployment
- web embedding
- Broad desktop and operating-system support.
FAQs
Why convert PFA to TTF?
Choose TTF as target when the font needs to be installed broadly across desktop platforms, bundled with applications, or shared as a general-purpose typographic asset.
What changes when converting PFA to TTF?
Convert to TTF when the font needs to be installed broadly across desktop platforms, bundled with applications, or shared as a general-purpose typographic asset. It is a strong target for practical compatibility and widespread deployment. For compressed web delivery, WOFF or WOFF2 are usually better suited.
What should I review after converting PFA to TTF?
After conversion, review these destination checks: Open converted output in operating systems and verify behavior on real samples; Compare output against the expected scalable quality profile; Web delivery usually benefits from WOFF-family packaging instead.
How can I keep quality stable in PFA to TTF conversion?
Run representative samples, keep settings deterministic, and monitor these risks: Not every TTF carries the same typographic sophistication as richer OpenType workflows; Web delivery usually benefits from WOFF-family packaging instead; Validate destination compatibility before large-batch conversion.