Convert anything, at global scale.
200+ formats and automation APIs that feels instant.
CONVERT
From
To
Drop files or choose a source
Upload multiple files at once, mix formats, and fine-tune every conversion with format-aware settings.
Max 2GB per file · Drag & drop ready · Mixed file types welcome
TAR at a glance
TAR
tar predates many modern archive formats and became deeply embedded in Unix administration, software distribution, and source/package workflows.
LZ at a glance
LZ
Before newer compressor families took over, Unix environments relied heavily on older LZW-style compression conventions that now survive mainly in archives and legacy systems.
Format comparison
| Feature | TAR | LZ |
|---|---|---|
| File type | Archive | Archive |
| Extensions |
|
|
| MIME type |
|
|
| Compression / quality | lossless | lossless |
| File size characteristics | depends | depends |
| Compatibility | broad | broad |
| Editability | low | low |
| Created year | 1979 | 2008 |
| Inventor | AT&T Bell Labs | Antonio Diaz Diaz |
| Status | active | active |
| Primary use cases |
|
|
| Common software |
|
|
| Archival suitability | moderate | moderate |
| Metadata handling | moderate | moderate |
| Delivery profile | strong | strong |
| Workflow fit | packaging | packaging |
When to use each format
When to use TAR
- download packaging
- backup exchange
- cross-platform sharing
- Excellent at packaging multi-file directory trees and metadata together.
When to use LZ
- download packaging
- backup exchange
- cross-platform sharing
- Historically important in compression history.
FAQs
Why convert TAR to LZ?
Choose LZ as target when convert to LZ only when a legacy Unix or archival workflow explicitly expects it.
What changes when converting TAR to LZ?
Convert to LZ only when a legacy Unix or archival workflow explicitly expects it. Typical use involves recovering older compressed files, normalizing inherited asset stores, or maintaining format compatibility for systems that were built around historical compression utilities. For new work, newer stream compressors are usually more practical.
What should I review after converting TAR to LZ?
After conversion, review these destination checks: Open converted output in legacy Unix tools and verify behavior on real samples; Compare output against the expected lossless quality profile; Obsolete for most new workflows.
How can I keep quality stable in TAR to LZ conversion?
Run representative samples, keep settings deterministic, and monitor these risks: Far less common than newer compressors; Obsolete for most new workflows; Validate destination compatibility before large-batch conversion.