Convert anything, at global scale.
200+ formats and automation APIs that feels instant.
CONVERT
From
To
Drop files or choose a source
Upload multiple files at once, mix formats, and fine-tune every conversion with format-aware settings.
Max 2GB per file · Drag & drop ready · Mixed file types welcome
X3F at a glance
X3F
Sigma raw support is closely tied to the company's Foveon sensor story, giving X3F a reputation and workflow profile that differ from more mainstream Bayer-centric raw ecosystems.
JPS at a glance
JPS
JPS belongs to the period when consumer 3D displays, cameras, and media players experimented with stereo-photo conventions built on ordinary JPEG assets instead of inventing entirely new everyday imaging stacks.
Format comparison
| Feature | X3F | JPS |
|---|---|---|
| File type | Image | Image |
| Extensions |
|
|
| MIME type |
|
|
| Created year | 2002 | 2000 |
| Inventor | Sigma (Foveon) | JPEG Stereoscopic community |
| Status | proprietary | active |
| Transparency | Not supported | Not supported |
| Animation | Not supported | Not supported |
| Primary use cases |
|
|
| Layer support | Not supported | Supported |
| Vector scaling | Not supported | Supported |
| Camera raw data | Supported | Not supported |
| HDR support | Not supported | Not supported |
| Streaming ready | Not supported | Supported |
When to use each format
When to use X3F
- Your source file is already in X3F.
- Preserve source expectations before exporting to JPS.
- X3F is commonly used in image workflows.
When to use JPS
- Your target workflow expects JPS.
- Improve delivery compatibility with JPS.
- JPS is commonly used in image workflows.
FAQs
Why convert X3F to JPS?
Convert to JPS when preserving stereoscopic photo pairs, preparing side-by-side 3D images for compatible viewers, or maintaining archives from cameras and displays that used the JPEG Stereo convention.
It is mainly useful for legacy stereoscopic-image exchange rather than mainstream still-image publishing.
What changes when converting X3F to JPS?
This conversion changes how the format behaves in downstream tools and delivery environments.
Moving to JPS adds layer support. Moving to JPS adds vector scaling. Moving to JPS removes camera raw data. Moving to JPS adds streaming delivery.
What should I review after converting X3F to JPS?
Validate output quality on representative files and confirm the target format behaves correctly in the destination workflow.