Convert anything, at global scale.
200+ formats and automation APIs that feels instant.
CONVERT
From
To
Drop files or choose a source
Upload multiple files at once, mix formats, and fine-tune every conversion with format-aware settings.
Max 2GB per file · Drag & drop ready · Mixed file types welcome
TXT at a glance
TXT
Plain-text files are older than most modern document ecosystems, and many later markup and structured-writing formats exist precisely because people wanted to preserve text readability while layering more structure on top.
Xfig at a glance
Xfig
Xfig began in 1985 and accumulated decades of maintenance and export tooling, which made the .fig format a durable bridge between interactive diagram editing on Unix systems and downstream conversion to PostScript, PDF, and other outputs.
Format comparison
| Feature | TXT | Xfig |
|---|---|---|
| File type | Document | Vector |
| Extensions |
|
|
| MIME type |
|
|
| Compression / quality | depends | scalable |
| File size characteristics | medium | small |
| Compatibility | broad | moderate |
| Editability | moderate | high |
| Created year | 1963 | 1985 |
| Inventor | ASCII/plain-text computing tradition | Supoj Sutanthavibul |
| Status | active | legacy |
| Primary use cases |
|
|
| Common software |
|
|
| Archival suitability | strong | good |
| Metadata handling | moderate | moderate |
| Delivery profile | strong | strong |
| Workflow fit | exchange | design |
| Vector scaling | Not supported | Supported |
| Structured data | Supported | Supported |
When to use each format
When to use TXT
- authoring
- review and collaboration
- distribution
- Nearly universal readability.
When to use Xfig
- illustration
- diagramming
- brand asset delivery
- Preserves object-level editability for technical diagrams.
FAQs
Why convert TXT to Xfig?
Choose Xfig as target when technical diagrams and figures in Unix academic workflows, legacy Xfig drawing migration, and scientific publication figure production on Unix.
What changes when converting TXT to Xfig?
Technical diagrams and figures in Unix academic workflows, legacy Xfig drawing migration, and scientific publication figure production on Unix.
What should I review after converting TXT to Xfig?
After conversion, review these destination checks: Open converted output in xfig and verify behavior on real samples; Compare output against the expected scalable quality profile; Closely tied to the Xfig ecosystem and long-tail compatibility workflows.
How can I keep quality stable in TXT to Xfig conversion?
Run representative samples, keep settings deterministic, and monitor these risks: Not a mainstream modern illustration exchange format; Closely tied to the Xfig ecosystem and long-tail compatibility workflows; Validate destination compatibility before large-batch conversion.