Convert anything, at global scale.
200+ formats and automation APIs that feels instant.
CONVERT
From
To
Drop files or choose a source
Upload multiple files at once, mix formats, and fine-tune every conversion with format-aware settings.
Max 2GB per file · Drag & drop ready · Mixed file types welcome
Xfig at a glance
Xfig
Xfig began in 1985 and accumulated decades of maintenance and export tooling, which made the .fig format a durable bridge between interactive diagram editing on Unix systems and downstream conversion to PostScript, PDF, and other outputs.
TXT at a glance
TXT
Plain-text files are older than most modern document ecosystems, and many later markup and structured-writing formats exist precisely because people wanted to preserve text readability while layering more structure on top.
Format comparison
| Feature | Xfig | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| File type | Vector | Document |
| Extensions |
|
|
| MIME type |
|
|
| Compression / quality | scalable | depends |
| File size characteristics | small | medium |
| Compatibility | moderate | broad |
| Editability | high | moderate |
| Created year | 1985 | 1963 |
| Inventor | Supoj Sutanthavibul | ASCII/plain-text computing tradition |
| Status | legacy | active |
| Primary use cases |
|
|
| Common software |
|
|
| Archival suitability | good | strong |
| Metadata handling | moderate | moderate |
| Delivery profile | strong | strong |
| Workflow fit | design | exchange |
| Vector scaling | Supported | Not supported |
| Structured data | Supported | Supported |
When to use each format
When to use Xfig
- illustration
- diagramming
- brand asset delivery
- Preserves object-level editability for technical diagrams.
When to use TXT
- authoring
- review and collaboration
- distribution
- Nearly universal readability.
FAQs
Why convert Xfig to TXT?
Choose TXT as target when you need the words without the formatting.
What changes when converting Xfig to TXT?
Convert to TXT when you need the words without the formatting. It is a strong target for extraction, indexing, NLP preprocessing, OCR review, notes, and system handoffs where formatting would be lost anyway. Use it when portability and text-only access matter more than layout, styling, or embedded media.
What should I review after converting Xfig to TXT?
After conversion, review these destination checks: Open converted output in everything from terminal tools to editors and office suites and verify behavior on real samples; Compare output against the expected depends quality profile; No native rich formatting or semantic structure.
How can I keep quality stable in Xfig to TXT conversion?
Run representative samples, keep settings deterministic, and monitor these risks: Encoding and line-ending differences can still create practical interoperability issues; No native rich formatting or semantic structure; Validate destination compatibility before large-batch conversion.